Yahoo: Why would Daily Mail or anyone else buy net firm?

the link of the news

This news talks about if it's worth buy Yahoo or not. The author of this news says it is because nowadays it continues making money and it's the second searched more used.

If I have the money to buy an old company like yahoo I wouldn't buy it because now it's not worth. Maybe a few years before I could do it but now it's impossible. Comparing yahoo with Google it doesn't have anything to do.  I can't understand how rich people can expend millions and put in risk his money to make more, of course their intention it's don't lose it but risk thousands of millions for more... Maybe that's why I'm not rich, I think a lot of people can't do it, only rich people wich are not afraid of lose everything.

shutting (tencar)

coverage  (cobertura)

revenues ( ingresos públics)

Doctors weigh in on dangers of Wi-Fi signal exposure

Wi-Fi can be dangerous for our health, that's the thesis of the news. I'm fond of with the opinion of the Doctors, we should reduce the use of the phone and when we don't use it we must disable the Wi-Fi connection. I thnik can be dangerous but always happens the same we won't change our habits unless we die in a few weeks, because our determination is weak . The first step to reduce our use with Wi-Fi can't be radical because it won't be stable and we will fall again. We can't be obsesive trying to change everything on our life but we can try to change the most possible.

The link of the news 

infertility (infertilitat)
handheld (de mà)
lead ( plom)
committed (compromès)